<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OUCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lenmunsil.com/2007/05/ouch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lenmunsil.com/2007/05/ouch/</link>
	<description>President of Arizona Chrsitian University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob J.</title>
		<link>http://lenmunsil.com/2007/05/ouch/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.lenmunsil.com/2007/05/ouch/#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Len,
For all of the reasons you state below--terrific marriage, father of five, valedictorian of BYU, life long member of a pro-life church (even a Bishop and a Stake President in that church)--where do you think Romney is more comfortable?  As a pro-life Republican candidate running for President, or as a &quot;I will not work to change the current status of the law&quot; Republican candidate running for governor of Massachussets?
To be concerned that Romney is not pro-life is to ignore the obvious.
Now, you may be concerned about why Romney, given his pro-life beliefs, did not challenge Massachussets&#039; pro-choice policies during his candidacy for governor, but that is a concern you do not appear to be raising in this post.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Len,<br />
For all of the reasons you state below&#8211;terrific marriage, father of five, valedictorian of BYU, life long member of a pro-life church (even a Bishop and a Stake President in that church)&#8211;where do you think Romney is more comfortable?  As a pro-life Republican candidate running for President, or as a &#8220;I will not work to change the current status of the law&#8221; Republican candidate running for governor of Massachussets?<br />
To be concerned that Romney is not pro-life is to ignore the obvious.<br />
Now, you may be concerned about why Romney, given his pro-life beliefs, did not challenge Massachussets&#8217; pro-choice policies during his candidacy for governor, but that is a concern you do not appear to be raising in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
