<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINCOLN&#8217;S BIRTHDAY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lenmunsil.com/2008/02/lincolns-birthday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lenmunsil.com/2008/02/lincolns-birthday/</link>
	<description>President of Arizona Chrsitian University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://lenmunsil.com/2008/02/lincolns-birthday/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.lenmunsil.com/2008/02/lincolns-birthday/#comment-196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Len,
Your analysis only works if you believe the Civil War was about slavery. The war wasn&#039;t about slavery. The war was about state rights vs. federal rights.
And, of course, the Republican party, generally, has actually upheld state rights over federal rights.
The mantra, &quot;Local government is the best arbiter of what needs to be dealt with locally&quot; is a Republican slogan.
Taking your line on the Republican Party as the party for freedom, many Republicans have argued for the pro-choice position. I don&#039;t agree with them, however, I do understand how they might come to this conclusion.
However, if you argue that the argument against Slavery was really a &#039;pro-life&#039; argument (which comes through the movie, Amazing Grace, which I watched last evening), then I think you can make an apriori case for the abolition of slavery and anti-abortion coming from the same root.
Just some thoughts.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Len,<br />
Your analysis only works if you believe the Civil War was about slavery. The war wasn&#8217;t about slavery. The war was about state rights vs. federal rights.<br />
And, of course, the Republican party, generally, has actually upheld state rights over federal rights.<br />
The mantra, &#8220;Local government is the best arbiter of what needs to be dealt with locally&#8221; is a Republican slogan.<br />
Taking your line on the Republican Party as the party for freedom, many Republicans have argued for the pro-choice position. I don&#8217;t agree with them, however, I do understand how they might come to this conclusion.<br />
However, if you argue that the argument against Slavery was really a &#8216;pro-life&#8217; argument (which comes through the movie, Amazing Grace, which I watched last evening), then I think you can make an apriori case for the abolition of slavery and anti-abortion coming from the same root.<br />
Just some thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
